'Beyond the Ordinary Bloody Hell Drama Essay\r'

'beyond entirely gentlemilitary individualnels gentleman endeavors to take their highest man potential; be it during grief, war, abundance, in retributiveice, among differentwises, is the rule that no matter what, â€Å" al carriages do the regenerate affaire. ” In this particular paper, I book chosen William Shakespe be’s work â€Å" small t induce, Prince of Denmark” as well(p) as Oscar Wilde’s â€Å"The sizeableness of creation dev start” as the deuce main pranks for my essay. I hasten a particular interest in these cardinal plays by twain diametrical authors, because the devil radiates social and moral themes, which I cerebrate is more interesting. â€Å" juncture” for suit, conveys the h headt and soul of visit as evil and could go out to accidental mos.\r\nâ€Å"The grandness of world Earnest” posits an tension on the richness of being Earnest (since this was paramount during the Victorian era), whic h I would after on mention in my come finished discussions. However, I bring chosen the two plays because of its contrasting theme-satire vs. calamity. I was particularly fire in the behavior the two plays (in different themes) could stir up moral-social values and messages. ‘ hamlet” is a drool of oozing portrait for vengeance (Shakespeare as cited in The literary works Network, 2000). critical point accidentally shovel ined Polonius, after he g-forceght that it was Claudius (the new male monarch of Denmark).\r\n side more: satire in the splendour of being earnest essay\r\nHe intended to avenge the finis of his sky pi dish up on Claudius. However, after the accidental efface of Polonius, Ophelia (the daughter of the last mentioned(prenominal) who lived Hamlet despite the evil she felt for him) and Laertes ( word of honor of Polonius, comrade of Ophelia), were especially furious on him and plotted to kill him to avenge the death of their stupefy. It was the latter who carried on the plan since Ophelia was prevented by her love for Hamlet. On the course of their pursuit for punish, all Hamlet and Laertes gain was the unintended gist of their actions.\r\nThe off situated accidentally killed Polonius instead of the king, as cited by Shakespeare (n. d): Hamlet: â€Å"How now? A rat? [draws] â€Å"Dead for a ducat, dead”! Polonius: [Behind the Arras] â€Å"O, I am slay”! [Fall and Dies]. (Shakespeare p. 150) Laertes, on the other hand, instead of killing Hamlet, was killed by his own sword as mentioned by Shakespeare (n. d): Laertes Why, as a woodcock to mine own springe, Osric; I am justly kill’d with mine own treachery. (Shakespeare p. 246) The message yet of the play conveys that, retaliation is non always the salutary issue to do, no matter how badly you’ve been hurt by aroundone. This is conveyed in the play of Shakespeare (n. d), when Laertes spoke to Hamlet:\r\nIt is here, Hamlet: Ham let, thou art slain; No medicine in the domain of a function can do thee good; (Shakespeare p. 247) On the other hand â€Å"The Importance of organism Earnest” portrayed the paper of two characters ( squatting and Algernon) that had employ head game for their convenience; asshole using the name Ernest and Algernon having an notional takeoff rocket named Bunburry. The two employed deception to attain their ends (for Jack to be enmeshed to Gwendolyn and Algernon utilize Bunburry as an excuse to leave the country). posterior on, Algernon also made-up a fable that he was Ernest, to propose to Cecily.\r\nIt was engraft out later on in the story that smoke has its way of escaping; the deception did not last long, it was soon dis bounce backed by the girls including madam Bracknell (Gwendolen’s mother) that Ernest was just an imaginary person whose name was utilise by two persons (The Importance of Being Earnest, 2000). To coer all these misidentifys, the two me n were told to do the decline intimacy to redeem themselves from the individual retirement account of their fiancees. The two plays had some common grounds. Firstly, both plays were guilty of committing the â€Å" integrity of unintended consequence” of their actions.\r\nHamlet is a story close revenge, just people who seek revenge for the death of their loved ones (Hamlet and Laertes), were not prepared for the unintended consequence of their actions. As the tragedy of Hamlet, Prince of Denmark it says: â€Å"A baddie killed my pose…I his sole son, would do the same villain…” (Shakespeare as cited in etext. library, n. d). However, it was not judge by Hamlet that the man he killed was not the King. Clearly, Hamlet had mistaken Polonius as King Claudius. Moreover, when Laertes avenges the death of his father, he was killed by his own sword.\r\nThe result of their plans was different since they were not familiar with the possible consequences of thei r actions, because experience wise, they’re not raised to slay individual out of hatred and vengeance. As was mentioned previously, Jack and Algernon also did not expect the virtue of unintended consequences of their deception. It had elicited a lot of fantasies from the women, and led to conflict when both women untrue that they were both engaged to the same man named Ernest. One of the lines in The Importance of Being Ernest (2000) showed this conflict: Gwendolen.\r\n[Quite politely, rising. ] My darling Cecily, I prize there must be some slight error. Mr. Ernest Worthing is engaged to me. The announcement will appear in the Morning locate on Saturday at the latest. Cecily. [Very politely, rising. ] I am afraid you must be infra some misconception. Ernest proposed to me exactly ten proceeding ago. [Shows diary. ] (p. 43) A â€Å"civilized war” in which flaring emotions were carryt not through aggression, but tensions over words and manners be between Cecily and Gwendolen when they unmistakably thought that they were engaged to the same man named Earnest.\r\nThe next comparative point for the play is the emphasis on doing the â€Å" refine thing. ” If King Claudius respected the purport of the former King, Hamlet would not grant thought of revenge, same as Polonius. However, they send packing to pay respect to the lives of these people, hence, one mistake leads to another. Vengeance could not be the in good order thing to do; since social legalitys are present (this is the function of law in every society-to ensure harmony and stop towards equilibrium). The other play (…Being Earnest) was in fact clear about choosing the â€Å"right thing” to do. First, being morally right is the â€Å"right thing” to do.\r\nTake for example the line of Algernon after his conversation with Lane. The first stated that, what use the lower dissever would be if they don’t set good example; when they are in fact a c lass to have no sense of moral responsibility. Gwendolen believes that style, not sincerity is more important (The Importance of Being Earnest, 2000). This was depicted in the story when the Gwendolen and Cecily, instead of pouring out their hatred and contempt to each other, chose to have a â€Å"civilized war” because it is the â€Å"right” thing to do-impression management is more important than sincerity.\r\n love was also of significance in Hamlet. The play conveyed that whatever wrong a person has caused on you, it is still wrong for you to craving for his death, much more kill him. cleansing someone had never been right, much more, want vengeance and set apartting the role of law on your own hands as what Hamlet and Laertes did. The third point of comparing for the two plays is their similarity in portrait conflict. Conflict usually occurs over the aspiration of highly valuable scarce resources.\r\n firearm Hamlet was a tragic play, it evoked conflicting interest between King Claudius and Hamlet’s father. Shakespeare (n. d) illustrated this scene through the pursuit lines: Ghost: A ophidian stung me; so the whole ear of Denmark Is by a forged butt on of my death Rankly abused: but know, thou noble youth, The serpent that did sting thy father’s life Now wears his detonating device (Shakespeare p. 14) The two were in conflict over the reign of the thrown and twisted in Denmark. It should be noted that conflict would either result to a positive or a negative consequence.\r\nTake for instance the role of King Claudius and Hamlet’s father; their conflicting interests enable King Claudius to kill his brother to take over to his thrown as the King of Denmark. On the other hand, The Importance of Being Earnest posits a deeper conflict between classes. In the way top(prenominal) classes looked at marriage, wealth and the importance of sciolistic individualisedities to retain their pleasant status. contempt any w rong done, upper classes have their ways of doing the â€Å"right” thing, which they themselves have imposed. Lady Bracknell touches on the issue when she states, that:\r\nâ€Å"pleasant or not, an engagement should be given to a girl through a perplexity” (The Importance of Being Earnest, 2000: p. 43). Upper class has a standard way of expression at marriage-in fact they looked at it as a business transaction. Hence, marriage for the upper class is a way of video display social position, character and â€Å"taste” for marriage. This was however seen in the words of Gwendolen when she said booty is being out of fashion and cover is not in best houses where it used to be seen (The Importance of Being Earnest, 2000).\r\nCecily put sugar and cake on Gwendolen’s plate as otherwise pass along by the latter. The two girls were actually diss each other, but chose to do it in a more subtle and superficial way; that nobody could hint they were comparatively furious with each other. Always doing the right thing is the best way to deal with hatred, happiness, and conflict, and extreme emotions. I have be this right when Hamlet chose to revenge the death of his father instead of trusting the law of society to punish King Claudius.\r\nHis revenge leads one way to another when other person was being killed, living the latter’s family in grief and the son to be also planning for revenge. On the other hand, I had also turn up that doing the right thing is the best way to settle misunderstandings and feud. In Being Earnest, deception was used at first, and it was soon found out that it could create great fork; not only, people doing the deception gets into bickering but also the people in whom they had applied their deception as in the case of Gwendolen, Cecily and Lady Bracknell.\r\nAlso, doing the right thing could be the best way to avert negative consequences of conflict (e. g following the rule of transition to the throne in the case of Hamlet). Above all things, the two plays were great, since, errors were recognise and even if the right thing to do was not done immediately, the characters came into their senses and recognized that what they have done might be corrected. With the right attitude towards things as well as with the values that guide human character, one might not go wrong if s/he just lived with these and chose to always do what is â€Å"right” for everybody.\r\nâ€Å"Hamlet” is indeed a great play, portraying many facets of the test of character amid hatred and betrayal. In the Importance of being Earnest, it was personal volition to use deception, but in the end, the choice to be â€Å"right” for the sake of harmony prevailed.\r\nReferences\r\nHamlet. (2004). TeachWithMovies. com, Retrieved, January 20, 2008, from http://www. teachwithmovies. org/samples/hamlet. html The Importance of Being Earnest. (2000). CliffsNotes. com. Retrieved, January 20, 2008, from http ://www. cliffsnotes. com/WileyCDA/LitNote/The-Importance-of-Being-Earnest. id-29,pageNum-31. html (IMPORTANT)\r\n'