Comparing Poor Mans Pudding, Bartleby, Ministers Black Veil, or Masqu

Lack of Epiph whatever in Poor Mans Pudding, Bartleby, Ministers threatening Veil, or masque of the rubicund Death In the Melville stories, Poor Mans Pudding and well-heeled Mans Crumbs and Bartleby, the scriber, the storytellers go through what appear to be life-changing experiences. Hawthorne offers a standardized analysis in The Ministers Black Veil as does Poe in masque of the Red Death. Yet, at the conclusion of each of these stories, there is no try out to suggest that the narrator is affected by the differences (and perhaps similarities) of their lives and those little fortunate. In Poor Mans Pudding and Rich Mans Crumbs The narrator has the opportunity to absorb, as untold as an outsider give the bounce, the heartache and trials of the lower class. While he cannot pass up the experience of being in the Coulters home as supposition provoking-- that appears to be all it is for him. But the instinct of the poor is wiser than we think. He does not totally align hims elf with the upper class in the due south fragment of the story but he will not spurn the benefits and privileges of wealth. He may be indwellingly affected by the everywhereeating and inclemency of the rich and the sympathetic circumstances of the poor, but any inward diversity is not exemplified in his outward behavior. ..Of all the preposterous assumptions of humanityness over humanity, nothing exceeds most of the criticisms made on the habits of the poor by the well-housed, well-warmed, and well-fed.Here, I believe, the lector is the one who is transmitd by the narrators experiences and the lack of change on the part of the narrator is upsetting to the reader. The reader is able to go with the narrator through both situations, but unlike the narrator, the reader is able to realise with th... ...ected by the differences (and perhaps similarities) of their lives and those less fortunate. They stand at the convergence that would bushel their char bringer and their f uture course of action. Some aim ambivalence, somewhat choose to see and turn away, others may even convince themselves that they atomic number 18 really better than they used to be. But without acting on any subjective change these people concur failed to convince the reader that they have been redeemed. Their inability or unwillingness to extend themselves to the cause of brotherhood and human kindness is their testament. The reader has no pity for these men, but unlike them the reader can internalize the lessons of their experiences and effect change in their own lives. Their bereavement to act is their greatest folly, but the reader can rise in a higher place these characters, recognizing their misfortune and take a different path. Comparing Poor Mans Pudding, Bartleby, Ministers Black Veil, or MasquLack of Epiphany in Poor Mans Pudding, Bartleby, Ministers Black Veil, or Masque of the Red Death In the Melville stories, Poor Mans Pudding and Rich Mans Crumbs and Bartleby, the Scrivener, the narrators go through what appear to be life-changing experiences. Hawthorne offers a similar outline in The Ministers Black Veil as does Poe in Masque of the Red Death. Yet, at the conclusion of each of these stories, there is no evidence to suggest that the narrator is affected by the differences (and perhaps similarities) of their lives and those less fortunate. In Poor Mans Pudding and Rich Mans Crumbs The narrator has the opportunity to absorb, as much as an outsider can, the heartache and trials of the lower class. While he cannot deny the experience of being in the Coulters home as thought provoking-- that appears to be all it is for him. But the instinct of the poor is wiser than we think. He does not totally align himself with the upper class in the second part of the story but he will not refuse the benefits and privileges of wealth. He may be inwardly affected by the gluttony and callousness of the rich and the sympathetic circumst ances of the poor, but any inward conversion is not exemplified in his outward behavior. ..Of all the preposterous assumptions of humanity over humanity, nothing exceeds most of the criticisms made on the habits of the poor by the well-housed, well-warmed, and well-fed.Here, I believe, the reader is the one who is changed by the narrators experiences and the lack of change on the part of the narrator is upsetting to the reader. The reader is able to go with the narrator through both situations, but unlike the narrator, the reader is able to sympathize with th... ...ected by the differences (and perhaps similarities) of their lives and those less fortunate. They stand at the crossroad that would define their character and their future course of action. Some choose ambivalence, some choose to see and turn away, others may even convince themselves that they are actually better than they used to be. But without acting on any internal change these people have failed to convince the read er that they have been redeemed. Their inability or unwillingness to extend themselves to the cause of brotherhood and human kindness is their testament. The reader has no pity for these men, but unlike them the reader can internalize the lessons of their experiences and effect change in their own lives. Their failure to act is their greatest folly, but the reader can rise above these characters, recognizing their failure and take a different path.