The Indian Uprising (a Critique) :: essays research papers

Any authors primary goal in story writing is to capture an idea or topic to their reading audience. The conventional wisdom on this thought is that the clearer this is conveyed, the greater the appeal to the reader. However, some authors feel the need to stand pat this trend and forge new paths that sometime leaves the meanings of their stories obscure and hidden from the fair reader. Donald Barthelme has dispensen this optional approach with his story "The Indian Uprising". thither are several reasons that I did not fully enjoy this post-colonial victimize story. One, its "point" is vague and this is a challenge to my current reading abilities and two, it rambles on its disjointed timeline to the point that I became easily lost. However, there is something that the story brought to alight that I am now more fully aware of than beforehand reading this story. That is my own abilities of intellectual analysis. It is these areas that I wish to elaborate upon.Don ald Barthelmes cut into twisting of the subtleties in meaning in his story is intriguing. However, as a recent popular movie so elegantly put it, it go forth me dazed and confused. I couldnt seem to figure out what the point or moral of the story should be. Was this a story of a battle betwixt cowboys and Indians, as it suggests in its title? The story starts off leading you to take this as a real possibility with lines such as "We defended the city as best we could. The arrows of the Comanches came in clouds."(123). Or was it a story of chouse set in the time of war? "...we issued entrenching tools to those who seemed trustworthy and turned the heavy-weapons companies so that we could not be surprised from that direction. And I sat there acquire drunker and drunker and more in love and more in love." (124). Although the story bounces between these two main "insinuations", it is never clear to me what or who the story is round and I found this to be an unfulfilling reading. In retrospect my previous readings of books have been more of the atypical writing style. One that leaves you comfortable and pander and without guesswork "The Indian Uprising" avoids this style at all cost. The authors feeling on writing in the style of a collage, although fascinating, is very confusing. I will be the first to admit Im not the most devouring(a) of readers, but having to read a story two or flat three times and still not fully perceiving its meaning make it an even more arduous read.